Sundar Yamunachari wrote:
> Dave Miner wrote:
>> Evan Layton wrote:
>>> Hi Sundar,
>>>
>>> Looking at what we're doing in setup-dhcp.sh and how the dhcp server 
>>> needs to be set up it appears that in order to create the proper 
>>> macro we have to have the default router for that subnet we are 
>>> attempting to configure. However if the subnet we're are attempting 
>>> to configure is not the same as the default router on the server we 
>>> have no way to determine the router for that subnet.
>>>
>>> Based on this I've found no way to do any kind of automated 
>>> configuration of all the subnets on the system. The best I can think 
>>> of to do for this bug is to print out a message telling the user that 
>>> we found other subnets and if they wish to configure those for dhco 
>>> they will have to do it manually. We can generate at least part of 
>>> the macro needed however since we need to default router for the 
>>> subnet to do this we can only give an example and not a fully 
>>> functional command.
>>>
>>> Does anyone have any ideas on another way to handle this or to gather 
>>> the default router for all the subnets on the server?
>>>
>>
>> Well, strictly speaking a router (default or otherwise) is only 
>> required if you need to communicate with systems which are not on your 
>> local link.  If the install server is connected to the link, then 
>> installation should work just fine without any router being 
>> configured.  Thus I'm not sure what problem you're concerned about here?
> The bug report mentions that the clients in the second interface subnet 
> is getting the router that is in the first interface. This is because 
> the installadm code picks up the default router for system and setup the 
> DHCP macro and the client cannot access the router.
> 
>  From the bug report:
> 
> nic1 192.168.1.1 ---> router 192.168.1.254 --> connected to internet
> nic2 192.168.2.1 ---> router 192.168.2.1 --> private network
> 
> Our macro have router as 192.168.1.254 where as the submitter wanted 
> 192.168.2.1 as the router.
> 
> By creating network macros for each subnet 192.168.1.0 and 192.168.2.0, 
> we can ensure that the client gets the correct router

When creating these subnet macros do we not need to know the default router for 
the subnet?

-evan

> 
> - Sundar
>>
>> Dave
>>
> 


Reply via email to