Barbara Lundquist wrote: > OK - that makes sense. What should I do to put that statement back in? > Should I resend that file? Sounds like it's too late for this build... >
Build 111 already closed before this, so just provide Niall with the updated file. Dave > Barbara > > > Dave Miner wrote: >> Barbara Lundquist wrote: >>> I removed specific size restriction statements from the online help. >>> We want the help to be less vulnerable to changes. But the statement >>> is still in the Getting Started. >> The 2 TB limit mention should probably be retained, because when it >> changes there will be a project associated with it. >> >> Dave >> >>> Barbara >>> >>> Niall Power wrote: >>>> Thanks for the review and the heads up about the gate. >>>> >>>> I am not sure why the 2TB limitation is no longer mentioned. >>>> Is this still a limitiation. >>>> >>>> CC: ing Barbara for her comments. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Niall. >>>> >>>> jan damborsky wrote: >>>>> Hi Niall, >>>>> >>>>> the changes look good. >>>>> >>>>> Just out of curiosity, do you happen to know why >>>>> section mentioning 2TB limitation was removed ? >>>>> >>>>> Also, please be aware that gate is closed for pushes >>>>> for now until 'go' is received from Sanjay or Dave. >>>>> >>>>> Thank you, >>>>> Jan >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 04/01/09 09:06, Niall Power wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd like a code review for the fix for defect 7623. This is just a >>>>>> straight forward >>>>>> documentation update and no actual code changes are involved. >>>>>> Documentation >>>>>> was provided by Barbara Lundquist >>>>>> >>>>>> Bug: >>>>>> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=7623 >>>>>> >>>>>> Web rev at: >>>>>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~niall/bug-7623/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Niall >>> _______________________________________________ >>> caiman-discuss mailing list >>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org >>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
