Hey Jack,

Not a full review, but just a couple of nits


Does this change the syntax for ranges in the criteria from
'None' to 'unbounded' ?

VerifyXML.py -  278-279 - are these two lines supposed to be
commented out?


thanks,
-ethan


Jack Schwartz wrote:
> Hi everyone.
>
> Here is a webrev of my proposed fixes for:
>    4325 Better syntactic treatment of IP and MAC address AI criteria
>
> A medium-level description of the changes is in the bug-report:
>    http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=4325
>
> Webrev:
>    http://cr.opensolaris.org/~schwartz/090402.1/webrev/
>
> Testing done:
>
> Ran publish manifest and verified with webserver:
> - MAC: min/unbounded, IP: unbounded/max, network: min/unbounded,
>        mem: single <value> for range, minMAC has single digit btwn colons
> - range with three values: correctly failed validation
> - range with two unbounded values: correctly failed validation
> - range with 0 minimum: correctly passed validation
> - single IP addr given as a <range>: corectly failed validation
> - pair of values given as a <value>: correctly failed validation
> - 2 values for non range criterion, surrounded by <value>: correctly 
> failed validation
> - single value for non range criterion, surrounded by <value>: passed 
> validation
> - 2 values for non range criterion, surrounded by <range>: correctly 
> failed validation
> - Try a combination with a non-numeric value (arch=sparc): worked
> Also verified list-manifests displayed data correctly.
>
> I'm requesting that Clay review, as he's most familiar with the code 
> I've changed and he has a heads-up that it's coming.  Others are 
> invited to review as well.
>
> Tomorrow I'll verify that an install starts as it should, but I have 
> confidence it will work as the webserver output looks fine.
>
> Sorry to rush.  I'm requesting a review ASAP, by COB tomorrow if 
> possible.  I'm supposed to be done on Friday, but to give less than 1 
> day for this review is not really realistic.
>
>    Thanks,
>    Jack
> _______________________________________________
> caiman-discuss mailing list
> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss

Reply via email to