Quoth Dave Miner on Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 01:45:51PM -0400: > David Bustos wrote: > >Quoth Dave Miner on Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 12:25:34PM -0400: > >>At the moment I'd think we would treat them as equivalent to site.xml, > >>which I presume you're tracking as well? > > > >I was also thinking of site.xml equivalence, but I'm not planning on > >tracking it separately in phase 1. > > So what's the implication of that for upgrades?
site.xml will behave as it does today -- it won't be re-applied on upgrade. More flexibility has been deferred to later phases. David
