Thanks for review Joe !

Jan


On 04/09/09 20:13, Joseph J VLcek wrote:
> jan damborsky wrote:
>> Hi Joe,
>>
>>
>> On 04/09/09 17:18, Joseph J VLcek wrote:
>>> jan damborsky wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> could I please ask two people for reviewing changes for following 
>>>> blocker ?
>>>>
>>>> 7944 auto-install dumps core installing 2009.06 b110 on T6300
>>>> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=7944
>>>>
>>>> webrev:
>>>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~dambi/bug-7944
>>>>
>>>> Thank you very much,
>>>> Jan
>>>>
>>>> modules affected:
>>>> -----------------
>>>> * libtd
>>>> * liborchestrator
>>>>
>>>> testing done:
>>>> -------------
>>>> [1] successful AI installation done on affected machine -
>>>>    no core dump occurred (please see bug report for details)
>>>>
>>>> # mount -Flofs /tmp/libtd.so.1 /usr/snadm/lib/libtd.so.1
>>>> # mount -Flofs /tmp/liborchestrator.so.1 
>>>> /usr/snadm/lib/liborchestrator.so.1
>>>> # /usr/bin/auto-install -p /tmp/ai_combined_manifest.xml
>>>> /tmp/ai_manifest.defval.xml validates
>>>> /tmp/ai_manifest_temp_6054.xml validates
>>>> /tmp/ai_combined_manifest.xml is a valid manifest
>>>> Auto reboot enabled
>>>> Checking any disks for minimum recommended size of 12646 MB
>>>> Disk c9t201500A0B8117690d1 size listed as 15360 MB
>>>> Default disk selected is c9t201500A0B8117690d1
>>>> Disk name selected for installation is c9t201500A0B8117690d1
>>>> no manifest slice information found
>>>> installation will be performed from http://ipkg.sfbay/dev 
>>>> (opensolaris.org)
>>>> installation will be performed from http://ipkg.sfbay/dev 
>>>> (opensolaris.org)
>>>> alternate IPS authority will be http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev 
>>>> (opensolaris.org)
>>>> list of packages to be installed is:
>>>> entire at 0.5.11,5.11-0.110
>>>> SUNWcsd
>>>> SUNWcs
>>>> slim_install
>>>> ...
>>>> Auto install succeeded. System will be rebooted now
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [2] TD test driver with new libtd reported correct slice
>>>>    information
>>>>
>>>> w/o fix:
>>>> --------
>>>> # /opt/install-test/bin/tdmgtst  -s c9t50060E8003277014d1
>>>> Caiman Target Discovery test program - Version 4
>>>>  >>> Getting slices by disk name=c9t50060E8003277014d1
>>>>  >>>     44 found
>>>>  >>>> matches slice c9t50060E8003277014d19s3
>>>> ...
>>>>  >>>> matches slice c9t50060E8003277014d19s2
>>>> ...
>>>>  >>>> matches slice c9t50060E8003277014d19s1
>>>> ...
>>>>  >>>> matches slice c9t50060E8003277014d19s0
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> w/ fix:
>>>> -------
>>>> # mount -Flofs /tmp/libtd.so.1 /usr/snadm/lib/libtd.so.1
>>>> # /opt/install-test/bin/tdmgtst  -s c9t50060E8003277014d1
>>>> Caiman Target Discovery test program - Version 4
>>>>  >>> Getting slices by disk name=c9t50060E8003277014d1
>>>>  >>>     4 found
>>>>  >>>> matches slice c9t50060E8003277014d1s3
>>>> ...
>>>>  >>>> matches slice c9t50060E8003277014d1s2
>>>> ...
>>>>  >>>> matches slice c9t50060E8003277014d1s1
>>>> ...
>>>>  >>>> matches slice c9t50060E8003277014d1s0
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [3] regression test
>>>>    installation done with new libraries and LiveCD based on 110
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> caiman-discuss mailing list
>>>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
>>>
>>> The changes look good Jan.
>>>
>>> I only have 1 small nit:
>>> usr/src/lib/liborchestrator/target_discovery.c
>>> +-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=
>>>  
>>>
>>>
>>> Issue 1: Miner Nit with comment wording
>>>
>>> Suggested change from:
>>>  894                  * associated with given disk, something might 
>>> went wrong during
>>>
>>> Suggested change to:
>>>  894                  * associated with given disk, something might 
>>> have gone wrong during
>>
>> Alok recommended following change to this comment:
>>
>> associated with given disk, something might went wrong during
>> ->
>> associated with given disk, something went wrong during
>>
>> which I think might be better for this situation,
>> since this condition shouldn't be met if everything
>> works correctly. Please let me know what you think.
>>
>> Thank you very much for review !
>> Jan
>>
>
> Sure that sounds good.
>
> Joe


Reply via email to