LGTM.

-Sanjay



On 04/20/09 16:16, Evan Layton wrote:
> Jean McCormack wrote:
>> Please update the copyright.
>>
>> line 993: eror > error
>
> fixed.
>
>>
>> Unfortunately, I don't know enough about be with zones to be
>> able to say "yeah you've fixed this".
>
> The problem was that I was calling be_zone_supported() with the wrong 
> thing. It should have been the zone dataset (for example 
> rpool/zones/zone1) not the whole active zone root dataset (for example 
> rpool/zones/zone1/ROOT/zbe-1). This worked in the November release but 
> really shouldn't have. The fix for bug 4794 uncovered this bug which 
> is this improper use of be_zone_supported().
>
> Thanks,
> -evan
>
>>
>> Jean
>>
>>
>>
>> Evan Layton wrote:
>>> I need two reviewers for:
>>>
>>> 6122 be_activate can fail to promote the zone root dataset
>>> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=6122
>>>
>>> Webrev:
>>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~evanl/6122/
>>>
>>>
>>> I did not believe that this was a blocker bug until this weekend
>>> when I ran into a situation where I could not destroy a BE until
>>> after I had manually promoted the ZFS datasets for the zone's
>>> root dataset belonging to the active BE. This is not normally an
>>> issue and in most use cases people wouldn't hit this however if
>>> the chain of parents and clones gets confused enough it is possible
>>> that we can get into a situation where a BE can not be destroyed.
>>> The fact that it's possible to hit this destroy filure at all made
>>> this a blocker.
>>>
>>> There is a possible work around for this issue. However it requires
>>> that the user find the uuid of the BE and then compare that to the
>>> parentbe property of the zone datasets to find the correct zone
>>> dataset. Then that zone dataset and any subordinate datasets have
>>> to be manually promoted.
>>>
>>> Testing this required checking that the correct BE's zones root
>>> datasets were promoted when a BE is activated. Also checking that
>>> the correct snapshots belong to the correct zone datasets after
>>> the activation of the BE.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -evan
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> caiman-discuss mailing list
>>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> caiman-discuss mailing list
> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss


Reply via email to