LGTM. -Sanjay
On 04/20/09 16:16, Evan Layton wrote: > Jean McCormack wrote: >> Please update the copyright. >> >> line 993: eror > error > > fixed. > >> >> Unfortunately, I don't know enough about be with zones to be >> able to say "yeah you've fixed this". > > The problem was that I was calling be_zone_supported() with the wrong > thing. It should have been the zone dataset (for example > rpool/zones/zone1) not the whole active zone root dataset (for example > rpool/zones/zone1/ROOT/zbe-1). This worked in the November release but > really shouldn't have. The fix for bug 4794 uncovered this bug which > is this improper use of be_zone_supported(). > > Thanks, > -evan > >> >> Jean >> >> >> >> Evan Layton wrote: >>> I need two reviewers for: >>> >>> 6122 be_activate can fail to promote the zone root dataset >>> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=6122 >>> >>> Webrev: >>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~evanl/6122/ >>> >>> >>> I did not believe that this was a blocker bug until this weekend >>> when I ran into a situation where I could not destroy a BE until >>> after I had manually promoted the ZFS datasets for the zone's >>> root dataset belonging to the active BE. This is not normally an >>> issue and in most use cases people wouldn't hit this however if >>> the chain of parents and clones gets confused enough it is possible >>> that we can get into a situation where a BE can not be destroyed. >>> The fact that it's possible to hit this destroy filure at all made >>> this a blocker. >>> >>> There is a possible work around for this issue. However it requires >>> that the user find the uuid of the BE and then compare that to the >>> parentbe property of the zone datasets to find the correct zone >>> dataset. Then that zone dataset and any subordinate datasets have >>> to be manually promoted. >>> >>> Testing this required checking that the correct BE's zones root >>> datasets were promoted when a BE is activated. Also checking that >>> the correct snapshots belong to the correct zone datasets after >>> the activation of the BE. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> -evan >>> _______________________________________________ >>> caiman-discuss mailing list >>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org >>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss >> > > _______________________________________________ > caiman-discuss mailing list > caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss