Dave Miner wrote: > Jan Damborsky wrote: > ... >> Going through that bug list, it seems that following are perhaps >> related to the installer, not dumpadm(1M) itself: >> >> 6495575 /var/crash/`uname -n` not helpful default in some cases >> 6755559 OpenSolaris snv_98 does not create /var/crash/$NODENAME$ >> >> I would like to ask in general what we should do with the issues >> we realize are related to the installer, but currently reported >> against different bug category ? >> Should we contact people who are currently in charge and work >> on moving those issues to the appropriate installer category ? >> >
Hi Dave, > I don't see that those are installer issues. Remember that our goal > is for services to configure themselves correctly, rather than having > dependencies on some extraneous piece like the installer. This is a good point. From this perspective I agree with you that both two bugs fall into that category. > They're both a matter of updating dumpadm to configure itself more > correctly for a world where systems might change names and where ZFS > is the root file system, and thus belong to that team (especially > since these same issues can arise in Solaris 10). You might kick up > the priority on them, though, and perhaps then we can get 5003 > resolved to everyone's satisfaction. That would be huge achievement given the level of ambivalence exposed during discussions happening around 5003 :-) Seriously, I will follow up on this with people responsible for dumpadm stuff once I am back from vacation. Jan
