Sundar Yamunachari wrote: > Dave Miner wrote: >> Sarah Jelinek wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> Located at: >>> >>> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/caiman/auto_install/AI_Reqs_Final/ >>> >>> Are an updated set of AI project requirements. These have been modified >>> from the initial set sent out and reviewed a few months back. Some >>> requirements have been clarified, some have been removed or reworded. >>> Those that are specifically different are marked with a **. The >>> requirements were revisited based on the initial discussion we had on >>> this alias and the data we gathered during the prototyping work we did >>> for AI. >>> >>> The old, initial requirements list is here: >>> >>> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/caiman/auto_install/auto_requirements/ >>> >>> Please review and comment. The date for closure on comments for the AI >>> requirements is one week from tomorrow, Friday, June 20th, noon PT. >>> >>> >> >> 3.2: it's not the language syntax, but the profile and rules that you're >> verifying. >> >> 4.1: "complete automation support" leaves much to the imagination and >> room for differing interpretations. I'd be more specific about what >> this means. >> > I believe that it means that we don't want to provide partial > automation support. We don't want to go in to interactive mode like > the Jumpstart installer if a sysidcfg configuration is missing. If a > configuration is critical and missing, the installer will fail. If it > is not critical, then the installer will continue.
This sounds more like behavior specification than a requirement. Unless you're saying "the installer is required to bomb-out when some required piece of configuration is not specified" >> 4.3: We're not providing upgrade in the interactive installer. Why do >> we provide it here? >> > It is a convenient way of updating the system and the users don't need > to deal creating BEs manually. They don't create BEs manually now with pkg image-update. -ethan > > - Sundar >> 10.1: I don't see why the "IPS installation affects performance" item is >> here. Let's take a crack at some target performance soon, though, as we >> need real criteria to judge against. Performance from a server on a >> gigabit network, for example, should be better than installation from >> the CD. >> >> 10.2: I don't understand what a "low-memory distribution" is meant to be. >> >> Dave >> _______________________________________________ >> caiman-discuss mailing list >> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > caiman-discuss mailing list > caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss >
