On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Dave Miner wrote: > My thought was that you can certainly create the default configuration as > requiring input, if that satisfies some identified need for safety. But if > Peter or William wants to live dangerously and have a network boot go > hands-free to installation, then I see no reason to make that excessively > difficult, which is where I think requiring expect falls; writing an expect > script that works across multiple releases with different names and so on > seems challenging, at least.
Now that makes sense. I think the current proposal needs to be augumented such that the user input can instead be supplied via a flag in the menu.lst That should satisfy both sets of users. Alok
