* Sanjay Nadkarni (Sanjay.Nadkarni at Sun.COM) wrote: > On 12/ 4/09 12:49 PM, Glenn Lagasse wrote: > >Hi Sanjay, > > > >* sanjay nadkarni (Laptop) (Sanjay.Nadkarni at Sun.COM) wrote: > >>Joe, > >> I am looking at Glenn's initial email which indicated that the > >>webrev did not include Python 2.6 changes. I am assuming that all > >>the updated webrevs are still not in sync with Python 2.6. If this > >>is not true then there are a few references to to Python 2.4 and > >>also some merge errors. > > > >The bulk of the webrev does not include Python 2.6 changes as we weren't > >merged with those changes. The one specific case where that's not true > >is for im_pop.py (previously known as DC_tm.py). > > > >I've got a merge of VMC with python 2.6 workspace which I'm regression > >testing right now. I don't plan to send out another webrev based on > >this workspace since merge changes shouldn't really need reviewing. > > > >Does this address any concerns you had? > > > >Thanks, > > > Yes..except please send out the webrev based on the merge once the > regression testing is complete.
Can/will do. Thanks Sanjay. Glenn
