On 10/07/09 13:17, Dave Miner wrote:
> Jack Schwartz wrote:
>> Hi everyone.
>>
>> Andre and I talked today about Driver Update testing, specifically 
>> which kinds of drivers are most important to test.  Andre mentioned 
>> disk (or target media), network and video drivers.
>>
>> We both agree that target media drivers are the most important, 
>> because without target media, you can't install.  Period.
>>
>
> Certainly.
>
>> We both agree that testing either wired or wireless network card 
>> drivers accomplishes the same thing, since both present a similar 
>> pathway to the net from the system.  Network drivers installed via 
>> DDU could be important if the network is unavailable and the driver 
>> is available on a USB stick or other local medium, for live CD case 
>> and text-mode installer if NWAM can make use of the driver/device 
>> right away.  (AI probably can't make use of this, as there is no 
>> interactive environment for the user to set it up and NWAM isn't 
>> going to be running.)
>>
>
> I think you're oversimplifying the AI case here since we are 
> supporting bootable AI media.  It seems likely that applying driver 
> updates to that via a boot to single-user, or in multi-user after AI 
> fails (followed by a restart of AI) is as useful as any other 
> environment.
True.  Just because AI is non-interactive doesn't mean there aren't ways 
of hands-on interacting with the system itself.
>
>> I'm thinking that video drivers are not important in testing.  Live 
>> CDs will already have a working video driver.  Text-mode installer 
>> won't need it for installation as it has a working console already, 
>> and AI is non-interactive.  Video drivers can be installed by the 
>> installer itself; using the DDU is not helpful here.
>>
>
> Video drivers typically have both a kernel component and an X "driver" 
> component, so it's not clear that the current media architecture would 
> support updates for these, but I'd suggest talking to Alan Coopersmith 
> to get his thoughts.
OK.  Thanks for the tip.

    Thanks,
    Jack
>
> Dave


Reply via email to