Jan Damborsky wrote: > > Dave Miner wrote: [...]
>> - OK as it is, but if we're going to start adding comments for the >> specifics behind files listed here, please drop a bug to get that >> completed (overall, I'd like to see this organized in some logical >> fashion - right now I can't discern why things are listed in the >> order they are). > > It seems that the initial intent was to have those files sorted > alphabetically, > but since not explicitly expressed in the manifests, the idea was > likely abandoned at > some point. > I agree that it might be better to have this organized in different > way, so that > relationships and dependencies are more evident. Then when some > feature is to be > removed, it would be easier to identify related pieces which can be > removed as well. > I will file bug for this. Bug 12244 was filed to tracked this issue. Jan
