Dave Miner wrote: > jan damborsky wrote: >> Dave Miner wrote: >>> As Jan mentioned at the meeting earlier today, I'd built a test >>> image which takes advantage of the package split I integrated under >>> bug 5468. Unhappy with the fact that the image didn't get any >>> smaller as a result, I spent the afternoon before the break doing >>> surgery on the package list for the AI image and managed to reduce >>> its size by 45%. Jan indicates that the resulting image does in fact >>> install, so I didn't completely blow it ;-) >> >> Yes, it seems that all necessary pieces are still there :-) >> I have also tried to install on machine with 1GB memory >> without swap and the installation was successful. >> (it fails with standard AI image - the problem is tracked by 4166). >> >>> >>> Below are my diffs for ai_x86_image.xml for one of you on the AI >>> team to pick up and integrate at your leisure. You'll need a >>> repository created with the fix for 5657 in order to take advantage >>> of it. >> >> Since reduced AI image resolves problem described in 4166, if you agree >> I would take those changes and integrate them as fix for that bug. >> > > Sure, please do.
ok, thank you ! Jan
