William Schumann wrote:
> Dave,
> Implemented all suggestions and revised webrev.
> William
> 

Looks OK, thanks.

Dave

> Dave Miner wrote:
>> William Schumann wrote:
>>  
>>> defect: AutomatedInstaller cannot find disks when default manifest is 
>>> used
>>>
>>> After discussion of the original bug report, it became clear that 
>>> more explicit logging would be very helpful to determine the behavior 
>>> of AI in evaluating disks for being install candidates.
>>>
>>> During development of these changes, some bugs were found and fixed 
>>> (below).
>>>
>>> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=5739
>>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~wmsch/bug-5739/
>>>
>>> Added logging for all code paths, reporting:
>>> - method of evaluation of target disk(manifest criteria, default)
>>> - reason for rejection of target disk candidate (failure to meet any 
>>> manifest criteria, disk too small)
>>>
>>> Found bugs: - not considering manifest element 
>>> target_device_use_solaris_partition when determining whether to take 
>>> default action
>>> - not using partition information for x86 when determining free 
>>> space(introduced in new code for bug 4195 
>>> <http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=4195> for SPARC 
>>> support)
>>> - using slice information not yet available (very minor)
>>>
>>> Unit tested combinations of criteria specifications on x86 & SPARC.
>>>
>>>     
>>
>> A few nits, looks pretty good:
>>
>> auto_install.c, 417: I'd modify this message to something like "Use of 
>> existing fdisk partition requested" so that it's a little less geeky.
>>
>> auto_parse.c, 268: why not just auto_log_print for this one?
>>
>> auto_td.c, 377: can we just delete this comment?  it's documented 
>> adequately in om_get_min_size, which is the right place for the issue, 
>> and I'm skeptical we would remember to fix this comment when that gets 
>> changed.
>>
>> Dave
>> _______________________________________________
>> caiman-discuss mailing list
>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
>>   


Reply via email to