The webrev has been updated. Only change is to transfer_mod.py.

I retested the normal usage and then tested the error cases.

Jean

Jean McCormack wrote:
> Karen Tung wrote:
>   
>> Hi Jean,
>>
>> One comment:
>>
>> For "TM_IPS_SET_PROP" mode in the transfer module, the prop name and
>> prop value must be specified as a pair.  Since there's no check to 
>> prevent people from
>> specifying the prop name and/or value more than once, we might run 
>> into inconsistencies, if
>> people are not calling the function correctly.  If they do something 
>> like the following,
>> it is "legal" according to the code, but it will mess them up:
>>
>> tm_perform_transfer([(TM_ATTR_MECHANISM, TM_PERFORM_IPS),
>>            (TM_IPS_ACTION, TM_IPS_SET_PROP),
>>            (TM_IPS_PROP_NAME, "flush-content-cache-on-success"),
>>            (TM_IPS_PROP_VALUE, "True"),
>>            (TM_IPS_PROP_NAME, "display-copyrights"),
>>            (TM_IPS_INIT_MNTPT, mntpt),
>>            (TM_PYTHON_LOG_HANDLER, dc_log)]))
>>
>> So, perhaps we should have some checks in the code to prevent the above?
>>     
> Sure I can do that. Leads me to wonder if the rest of the transfer 
> module calls are quite that robust.
>
> Jean
>
>   
>> Thanks,
>>
>> --Karen
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Jean McCormack wrote:
>>     
>>> Webrev: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~jeanm/slim_6102/
>>>
>>> CR: http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=6102
>>>  
>>> Note: The changes to ict are consistent with the other code in the 
>>> module. I have
>>> filed bug 6216 to look into changing ict to use the transfer module 
>>> for ips functionality.
>>> I talked with both Karen and Joe about this issue.
>>>
>>> Jean
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> caiman-discuss mailing list
>>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
>>>   
>>>       
>
> _______________________________________________
> caiman-discuss mailing list
> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
>   


Reply via email to