Ethan, What is wrong for reopening 3233, then doing another push for 3233, then closing it? William
Ethan Quach wrote: > William, > > Since you already pushed 3233, can you file a new defect to > push this addition with. > > > thanks, > -ethan > > > William Schumann wrote: >> Ethan, >> Indeed. I reopened the bug, added the fix. Please review. >> William >> >> Ethan Quach wrote: >>> William, >>> >>> I know this is already pushed but does the 'space_used' variable >>> instantiated at 979 potential cause the same bug? >>> >>> >>> thanks, >>> -ethan >>> >>> >>> William Schumann wrote: >>>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~wmsch/bug-3233/ >>>> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=3233 >>>> >>>> Space used for snapshots was being handled in an int, where it >>>> should have been handled in a 64-bit unsigned variable. >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> caiman-discuss mailing list >>>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org >>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss >> _______________________________________________ >> caiman-discuss mailing list >> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
