Glenn Lagasse wrote: > Hi All, > > So, DC currently considers the first step/checkpoint run as part of a > construction process as step number 0. Was this intentional? I ask > because now that the im-pop phase is a finalizer script and not baked > into DC proper, I'm wondering if numbering should start with 1 instead > of 0 (I realize most people just use the names in which case the issue > is moot). > > Added a level of complexity to make it step 1 and since people are encouraged to use names and not numbers there didn't seem to be any point.
Jean
