Hi Moriah,
Yes, please code review 9804, as this wad will be unaffected by
bug 11380.
Thank you,
Clay
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Moriah Waterland wrote:
> Clay,
>
> Are you still planning to putback fix for 9804 and do you still need a
> code review for this? It wasn't clear to me if you were planning to
> proceed with this putback or if you were going to table this fix until
> you evaluate 11380. I will be happy to do the code review if you need
> it, I just wanted to make sure that it will be useful.
>
> thanks,
> Moriah
>
>
>
> Clay Baenziger wrote:
>> Hi Danek,
>> Thank you for the idea. I hadn't thought of striping out the #!'s for
>> modules, etc. I found some files under /usr/lib/python2.4 are being
>> execfile'd by other Python scripts, which makes it hard to tell what the
>> heck's going on. So, I like this idea but expect it'll take some analysis
>> and filed bug 11380 - "Should strip out unnecessary #! lines from Python
>> files" for it.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Clay
>>
>> On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, Danek Duvall wrote:
>>
>>> Keith Mitchell wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is it worth leaving them in as a reference to which version of Python
>>>> the modules are intended to run with? Or is there a better, more
>>>> maintainable way?
>>>
>>> I don't think it's terribly worth it, no. If they're intended for public
>>> use, then they'll go into a versioned directory. If they're not, then the
>>> project they're part of should know what they're using.
>>>
>>> Danek
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> caiman-discuss mailing list
>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
>
