Looks good to me.

cheers

Matt


On 02/ 8/10 03:13 PM, Darren Kenny wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I would appreciate if I could get some review of this change for defect 13993:
>
>       http://cr.opensolaris.org/~dkenny/fix.13993.slim/
>
> where the GUI was changing the partition id of an unmodified primary partition
> when it should have be remained in the same location.
>
> For example, if you had the following layout:
>
>       Partition       Partition
>       Id              Type
>
>       1               Win95
>       2               FAT32
>       3               Linux
>       4               Extended
>
> and you removed partition id 2, with this fix you will get:
>
>       Partition       Partition
>       Id              Type
>
>       1               Win95
>       2               UNUSED
>       3               Linux
>       4               Extended
>
> Where previously, without this fix, you would have got:
>
>       Partition       Partition
>       Id              Type
>
>       1               Win95
>       2               Linux           <-Error!
>       3               Extended        <-Error!
>       4               UNUSED          <-Error!
>
> This would result in the Linux partition being unbootable (with out some
> detailed knowledge of the boot process) since it's root disk would have gone
> from /dev/hda3 to /dev/hda2, meaning that GRUB couldn't then find it, and if 
> you
> managed to get past then, then the vfstab file would be wrong.
>
> This is /possibly/ one of main reason that people install OpenSolaris after
> installing everything else in a multiboot environment (the other being that 
> you
> need to use the OpenSolaris GRUB to read ZFS).
>
> NOTE: Logical partitions will still have their partition id's changed but that
> is how it behaves in practice, even if you do it on other OSes like Linux and
> Windows.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Darren.
> _______________________________________________
> caiman-discuss mailing list
> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss

Reply via email to