Evan,

Looks good.

John

On 03/25/10 04:48 PM, Evan Layton wrote:
> On 3/25/10 5:25 PM, John Fischer wrote:
>> Evan,
>>
>> Are there other places within be_list.c:be_get_zone_be_list() before the
>> returns where zone_be should be reset to B_FALSE?
>
> CRAP! you're right I missed a couple of places where that should have
> been done. I've cleaned this up.
>
>>
>> Should there be a BE_UNMOUNT_FLAG_NULL just like there is a
>> BE_MOUNT_FLAG_NULL? This could then be used at line 1511 in be_create.c
>> and would make it more readable.
>
> Not a bad idea, I've added that and updated the webrev for both issues.
>
> Thanks for looking at this!
> -evan
>
>>
>> Otherwise looks good.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>> On 03/25/10 12:55 PM, Evan Layton wrote:
>>> I need reviewers for the following bugs:
>>> 7870 - beadm create fails if a zone has a dataset with a non-legacy
>>> mountpoint
>>> 9949 - beadm unmount fails when filesystems shared between BEs are
>>> also mounted.
>>> 12360 - beadm activate hits name collision if renamed BE's original
>>> name is reused
>>> 14096 - be_destroy_zones does not honor forced unmount
>>> 14998 - beadm create should clean up entries in menu.lst if
>>> corresponding BE doesn't exist and the entry can't be reused.
>>> 15245 - beadm create -p can core dump if there are zones
>>>
>>>
>>> Bugs:
>>> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=7870
>>> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=9949
>>> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=12360
>>> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=14096
>>> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=14998
>>> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=15245
>>>
>>> Webrev:
>>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~evanl/14096/
>>>
>>> This has been tested on x86, sparc testing is in progress and
>>> will be completed before the changes are pushed.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> -evan
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> caiman-discuss mailing list
>>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
>

Reply via email to