On 03/30/10 13:04, Alok Aggarwal wrote:
b134 text installer installed to rpool1, not rpool.
Was that
deliberate?
Yep, that's deliberate.
As part of trying to coexist with existing root pools on the
system, the text installer tries to pick a unique pool name.
I suspect the machine has a pre-existing root pool named
rpool that's either active or exported. That's likely why the installer
picked a pool name other than 'rpool'.
I noticed this during early eval of the text installer
as well, and 14612 was filed as a result. Particularly,
"Additionally, the algorithm does not take into account whether or not the user
elects to destroy an existing "rpool" on the chosen target disk, in which case,
re-using the name "rpool" would be perfectly acceptable."
-ethan
_______________________________________________
caiman-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
