Document current state, of course. When it changes, we can update
again.
Dave
(brevity or typos may be blamed on the iPhone)
On Mar 31, 2010, at 11:40 AM, Luis de Bethencourt <[email protected]
> wrote:
Dave Miner wrote:
On 03/31/10 10:41 AM, Luis de Bethencourt wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
On 03/31/10 09:21 AM, Luis de Bethencourt wrote:
Please review the fixes for:
Bug 14959 <http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?
id=14959> -
README: Step 3 (required IPS packages) - pkg names should be
updated
The Bug:
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=14959
The Webrev:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~luisbg/14959/
It's a small one but keeping the README up to date will make the
life
easier of all new developers to the project.
The bug snopsis seems a bit odd, perhaps the following instead?
required ips pkg names in README should be updated
But the package names look right.
Is there a reason the few SVR4 packages in the README haven't been
published to the extra repository yet?
-Shawn
Shawn,
I don't know why those SVR4 packages haven't been published in a IPS
repo. Anybody knows who exactly owns this?
What makes it even more bizare is that zoneint, which is one of
the 4
packages in that website has been for some time in the ipkg/dev
repos.
It just changed from SUNWzoneint, to be part of systems/zone/
internal.
So if one of the four is available in IPS, why not the other three?
You'd have to take that up with the ON lead. I don't see any
reason they shouldn't be offhand.
Dave
The question then is: should the README be fixed to how things are
currently now, or should the fix be hold pending until the ON lead
gives us an answer about how they should be (and when they will be
that way)?
Personally, I don't mind pushing a fix now and when ON pushes the
packages to an IPS repo (if they do), updating it again.
Luis
_______________________________________________
caiman-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
