On 01/10/11 14:35, Alok Aggarwal wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, Karen Tung wrote:
After dealing with a couple of issue as a result of the missing
files, I'm of the opinion that transfer should actually abort
processing if it fails to transfer one or more of the specified
files.
Transfer can also support an optional argument to continue processing
despite error,
with the default behavior be abort if any specified file is not found.
What would be a use case for that kind of a behavior?
Alok
For cases where it is OK to skip the files. The application
that uses it will know best. Since transfer checkpoint
is a general purpose checkpoint, I think it will be useful to provide
the flexibility, since it is very simple to do.
--Karen
_______________________________________________
caiman-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
