Hi Tomas,

Looks good to me.

Thanks,

Darren.

On 05/12/2011 10:23, Tomas Dzik wrote:
> This is just a reminder that I would appreciate if someone could review 
> these changes.
> 
> Thanks a lot in advance,
> 
> Tomas D.
> 
> Dne 30.11.11 13:14, Tomas Dzik napsal(a):
>> Hi all,
>> I would like to ask you for a code review for bug:
>>
>> 7052679 AI Sparc client gets wantboot.conf error when booting due to
>> restrictive umask
>> Webrev:
>>
>> https://cr.opensolaris.org/action/browse/caiman/t.dzik/7052679/
>>
>> Testing:
>>
>> 1) I built the gate with fix on x86 and on sparc.
>> 2) Using distro constructor I created AI iso image on both platforms
>> 3) I created virtual machines on x86 and on sparc and updated these
>> machines to the built gate
>> 4) I set umask for root to 0066 (as reported in bug)
>> 5) On x86 I created install service. For sparc I created it from
>> publisher and for x86 I created it from built AI iso image
>> 6) I verified permissions of wanboot.conf and system.conf
>> 7) I modified manifest, added it as a new default manifest and installed
>> x86 client (also on virtual machine) from this AI server.
>> I observed that client installed correctly.
>> 8) On sparc I created install service for sparc from built iso, added
>> new default manifest and also added new profile. (All command were run
>> with umask set to 0066.)
>> 9) I installed sparc client from this AI server and verified that client
>> installed correctly and used the right manifest and profile.
>> 10) Sources are pep8 clean.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Tomas D.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> caiman-discuss mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
> 
> _______________________________________________
> caiman-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
_______________________________________________
caiman-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss

Reply via email to