Hi John,
the only reason why I split this test into it's own file was that Mary suggested that I should consider splitting it. I think it depends only on personal preferences what someone consider to be "nicer" so I agree with both ways - I just need to find consensus on this mailing list.

Best regards,

Tomas D.

On 16.1.2012 18:44, John Fischer wrote:
Tomas,

Why create a new test file instead of just adding the check and SkipTest 
exception
to the current file?  Does raising SkipTest cause all the other tests to be 
skipped?
If so then I am fine with how this is written.

Thanks,

John

On Jan 16, 2012, at 8:22 AM, Tomas Dzik wrote:

Hi,
I would like to ask you for a code-review for:

7129922 test_create_service.DHCPServerTest.test_permissions unit test failure 
after 7052679 is putback

webrev:
https://cr.opensolaris.org/action/browse/caiman/t.dzik/7129922/

I fixed the above mentioned bug and also moved dhcp server test into it's own 
test file.

Testing done:

1) I run unittest in gate and test reported:

#142 Test correct permissions of dhcpd4.conf ... ok

2) I removed installadm and dhcpd commands from test machine using following 
commands:

# pkg uninstall pkg://solaris/install/installadm
# pkg uninstall pkg:/service/network/dhcp/isc-dhcp

3) I run unittests again and test reported:

#142 Test correct permissions of dhcpd4.conf ... svcs: Pattern 
'svc:/network/dhcp/server' doesn't match any instances
SKIP: DHCP SMF service not available

Best regards,

Tomas D.
_______________________________________________
caiman-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
_______________________________________________
caiman-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss

Reply via email to