i have the same problem. bake adds the loadmodeltest() function which
seems no longer supported. the tutorial in the wiki just tests a cake
method itself. if i try to setup/teardown a model of my app the classes
are not found.

same question sonic asked a while ago:
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php/browse_thread/thread/243c2b9bc07fe6ee/02a60d242d549e61?q=simpletest&rnum=1https://cakeforge.org/plugins/scmsvn/viewcvs.php/?root=testsuite

the bugs dirk described here...
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php/browse_thread/thread/8815708bcb1c8b/3940d165c3a74552?q=dirk+olbertz&rnum=2#3940d165c3a74552
... are from duplicate code in app/webroot/index.php and
app/webroot/test/index.php. just add the definition of CORE_PATH from
app/webroot/index.php to app/webroot/test/index.php and it works:

    if (!defined('CORE_PATH')) {
         if (function_exists('ini_set')) {
              ini_set('include_path', ini_get('include_path') .
PATH_SEPARATOR . CAKE_CORE_INCLUDE_PATH . PATH_SEPARATOR . ROOT . DS .
APP_DIR . DS);
              define('APP_PATH', null);
              define('CORE_PATH', null);
         } else {
              define('APP_PATH', ROOT . DS . APP_DIR . DS);
              define('CORE_PATH', CAKE_CORE_INCLUDE_PATH . DS);
         }
    }

it would be nice to fix this by using the same piece of code.

also there is a closed ticket about why the testsuite isn't included:
https://trac.cakephp.org/ticket/254

i don't agree to that. the testsuite wouldn't bloat a cake system
without unittests. it would help getting more people writing tests for
their webapps and have a better sleep.

what's about contributing to work on the testsuite?

cheers,
timo


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake 
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to