Wow glad to see you on the list Michal AD7six I have little knowledge on test suites and so ...
I have to acknowledge that I did not really test solometra. Xinha is cool, the css extension is what any web developer who wants control on the output of its app should want, but its not compatible with IE 5.5. Paul James's script is readable which is cool but lacks all that huge part which is image/file management. For the gmail thing I should learn how to get to edit that code brought by ajax. (If I enter url directly the sessions closes) FCK is quite difficult to look at but has that 4 wheels aspect: it deals with issues like "copy and paste from ms word", which is the kind of things I don't want to deal with. So I think I cannot avoid fck and have to dive more in it. Normally it should still be quite configurable, and I hope to be able to put it diet. Beside that I think it would be good to have a widget thing with a nice and readable code, so that we can produce quickly our own features. For instance I'm dreaming of having the possibility to edit php code and highlight it at the same time. Michal Tatarynowicz wrote: > I've also managed to integrate FCK into a custom Cake project of mine, > I've even made it so it used the same stylesheets as the main site (so > the edited text looked exactly like on the output page), but now I'm > trying to get out of it. It's a huge beast and if something breaks, I > wouldn't know how to fix it, and it breaks easily. It's not easy to > customize, too. > > I've tried many WYSIWYG editors and didn't much like any of them. > Solometra looks very nice, but I think it doesn't work as well as it > looks (or so I have experienced a minute ago). For example, I could not > figure out how to remove a hyperling short of digging into the html. > Xinha's demo page weights almost 360kB(!) which isn't much of a problem > for users (it can be compressed into something like 50-70 kB) but I > want a very lean codebase so that I can get to know it. > > I'm slowly rolling my own rich-text editor (and complimentary JS > libraries). I've started with the simplest wysiwyg editor I've found on > the web (http://www.peej.co.uk/sandbox/wysiwyg/) and now I'm > refactoring and patching the code. I want it to be easy to use, > lightweight (<100kB fully loaded), easily integrated into any project > and extensible with plugins. It uses code from a few well known > frameworks and libraries (jQuery, Moo, Proto, Dojo, Mochi). > > Anyhow, I'm still looking for the one perfect, free, stable, > standards-compliant and customizable WYSIWYG editor that someone wrote > for me, but I'm not holding my breath. I would love it if Google opened > their codebase, because their editor (in Gmail) is quite cool. Perhaps > we should reverse-engineer it? > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
