Hello, I am very interested in a 'stand alone' version of this CakePHP
Active Record.
If you wouldnt mind sharing it online I would very much like to take a
look at it. Maybe , a couple of us with a common need to have a
standalone Active Record could maintain a version of CakePHPs active
record as a parallel project ?
hydra12 wrote:
> Jon Baer wrote:
> > Ive recently figured out how to "extract" the Model portion from Cake
> > if that is what you mean .. I find it extremely handy to have when you
> > are on PHP4.
> >
> > If this is what you mean I can clean up the code but basically you
> > still need the /cake folder, I just place everything so only a single
> > require is needed ...
> >
> > ie: require('/path/to/cake/cake.php'); // framework
> >
> > - Jon
>
> I'd definitely like to see how you are doing that. Having to include
> the whole cake folder is not an ideal solution, but it might work for
> what I'm wanting. I've played with pear's db_dataobject, and I've
> looked at propel, but I really like the way cake does things. What I
> really want is something like cake's model, where I can just include
> one class, set a few variables (like database info, table name,
> associations, etc) and have it work.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
