I appreciate your pointing this out to me. Especially since I have read everything I can find about CakePHP but I have never seen any documentation for this. PEAR::Cache_Lite has a 4 year history of improvement, stability, and speed. Other than the complete obscurity of Cake's cache (which now I know its name a simple search reveals it is in basics.php) are there any benefits besides being able to use in an environment where PEAR is not allowed? Sorry for the flame bait. I think the simplest workable solution is best. So when I wanted a local cache I loked at Cake first. Seeing the docs for Cache model and no reference of any other, I thought that was it. If I had seen docs I would have used it. If I found NO docs on caching I would have asked.
Lorenzo: I avoided the Cache Model class because of the DB calls. There is nothing intrinsically wrong with it. In some situations you may atually want that. I just wanted a local cache that need not hit the network or database. Thanks, David --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
