The automagic is the slow part in my opinion. On May 19, 1:08 am, "Bogdan I. Bursuc" <[email protected]> wrote: > Plus there is the features a framework can offer. If a framework has 3 classes > don't think it helps u that much. But a framework like Cake which has a lot of > automagic which if you understand is very usefull. Might speed things up. > > -- > Thanks, > Bogdan Bursuc! > > > > > > > > > I also just read the summary: > > > Final Advice: There is more to consider than speed when selecting a PHP > > framework; other factors such as security, ease of installation and > > database support have to be examined as well. Other frameworks may be > > slower but have greater and wider community support, in case you have some > > trouble with the framework there are lots of users that could help who > > have working experience with that framework. This is true with CakePHP, > > Symfony and Zend framework, all of which are very popular among PHP > > developers. > > > Jeremy Burns > > Class Outfit > > > [email protected] > >http://www.classoutfit.com > > > On 19 May 2011, at 08:56, Jeremy Burns | Class Outfit wrote: > > > Put Michael Schumacher at the wheel of a Skoda and I bet he could beat me > > > in Ferarri. Benchmarks are mildy interesting, at best. > > > > Jeremy Burns > > > Class Outfit > > > > [email protected] > > >http://www.classoutfit.com > > > > On 19 May 2011, at 08:53, Bogdan I. Bursuc wrote: > > >> I've been using Cake 2.0 since 2.0-dev and I say that we should wait for > > >> the final release and then see the benchmarks. It's way faster than > > >> 1.3. And with so many new cool features. > > > >> -- > > >> Thanks, > > >> Bogdan Bursuc! > > > >>> On May 19, 7:30 am, mutabor <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>> Hi guys, > > > >>>> Lately, I came across another benchmark of popular PHP frameworks: > > > >>>>http://www.devshed.com/c/a/PHP/7-PHP-Frameworks-Tested-For-Speed/2/ > > > >>>> This is approx. 3rd or 4th benchmark of this type that I came across > > >>>> during last couple of month and in every benchmark Cake shows pretty > > >>>> poor results. > > > >>>> As a head of a company that specializes in CakePHP, I am very worried > > >>>> about Cake's future. Because even all of these benchmarks are wrong / > > >>>> have incorrect results, our customers still trust them and I start > > >>>> hearing "Anything, but not Cake, please, look at this > > >>>> benchmark ....seems it's not a good piece of software" from our > > >>>> customers. > > > >>> The usual problem with these benchmarks - is they don't set cake up > > >>> correctly in the first place (they use it out of the box; cake ships > > >>> in debug mode, with the session enabled etc.). And correcting that is > > >>> in the hands of the person publishing their "results". > > > >>> But: How many of your clients use hello world apps? > > > >>>> Something should be done, even if there is no opportunity to increase > > >>>> the speed, I guess Cake should apply some kind of PR actions :) > > > >>> The best thing that could be done in your eyes is for someone to > > >>> dedicate a bit of time making cake faster - if only you had a few > > >>> developers you could call upon to do that ... :) > > > >>> AD
-- Our newest site for the community: CakePHP Video Tutorials http://tv.cakephp.org Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://ask.cakephp.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php
