maybe this could be some very good solution, but it needs some hard shit to
do in database layer: http://www.doctrine-project.org/ basically it
intercepts everything u send to db, turns it into whatever is on the the
other side and get back to you what u requested.



On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Vanja Dizdarević
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Disclaimer: If there is a better place to ask this question, do tell!
>
> I have been working on this MongoDB plugin for 
> Cake<https://github.com/ichikaway/cakephp-mongodb>- specifically, I am 
> working on relations.
>
> As you might know, NoSQL systems offer a different approach on
> associations. For one, there is no "join tables" (at least not by default),
> but the associated records are stored as an array of ID's in the original
> record (and vice-versa for HABTM). There is an extensive amount of other
> possibilities, but for starters, I would like to mimic Cake's default model
> operations.
>
> As I understand it, the CRUD operations on associations are generated (or
> rather, instructed) by the Model class, not the DataSource class. Current
> Model implementation doesn't allow the datasource to decide which IDs go
> where and to adjust the logic of storage to the specific database adapters
> (and strategies).
>
> In short, Cake Model doesn't do that well with NoSQL which I guess is a
> design decision.
>
> I am, however, wondering what would be the best approach to solve these
> issues:
>
>    - Model doesn't recognize MongoID objects as UUIDs (best case scenario
>    is a 24hex), Cake supports only 16 and 32 binary or string types
>    - Model doesn't support the HABTM instructions specific to Mongo/NoSQL
>
> So, I am wondering how to go about solving these issues. Two ideas:
>
>
>    - Create an intermediate "MongodbModel" class (ex. Article (app model)
>    extends MongodbModel extends AppModel extends Model) and override the
>    saveMany, saveAssociated and saveAll methods.
>    - Create a Behavior and modify the CRUD logic where needed.
>
> Which approach would be more conventional? Is the second one at
> all feasible? Any other ideas are greatly appreciated.
>
> You can check out the code at
> https://github.com/dizyart/cakephp-mongodb/tree/2.0b the MongoAssociation
> test case offers some insight in what I'm trying to do (hasMany/belongsTo
> assoc. work fine). If additional details are required, I'd be happy to give
> them.
>
> Cheers!
>
>  --
> Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP
> Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "CakePHP" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>



-- 
*Ivan Rimac***
mail: [email protected]
*tel: +385 95 555 99 66*
*http://ivanrimac.com*

-- 
Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP
Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CakePHP" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to