After taking a quick peek at api.cakephp.org for both the 1.1 branches and 1.2 branches, I have to agree that the documentation for 1.2x is not as good as the documentation for 1.1x.
However, 1.2 hasn't been labeled as "stable" so I imagine that the API documentation for that could change before it's considered stable. Sure, this is a copout but the fact still remains: expecting code to be labeled as "development" to be stable, feature-rich and properly documented is setting yourself up for failure. I used to be a big believer in using cutting-edge, developer releases for code. Now, I only do that for my personal projects. For stuff where I am getting paid, I stick with stable releases because those *usually* come with enough documentation to answer most of my questions. On a related note, I'm happy to see I'm not the only one who sometimes drops down into the code itself to answer questions I have. ;) -- Chris Hartjes My motto for 2007: "Just build it, damnit!" rallyhat.com - digitial photo scavenger hunt @TheBallpark - http://www.littlehart.net/attheballpark @TheKeyboard - http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
