It's because I wanted to avoid all this useless law-related banter I originally made the framework public-domain.
I don't know how much of Cake code is "by" me, nor do I care. I can either be, or not be included as Cake's inventor/primary designer/ whatever. It is however a bit sickening to have it discussed how much kudos I'm "owned" tbh. I've stopped using Cake (or, more precisely branched with my own private version) long time ago, and since then I've re-written all of the code at least once. Every professional programmer uses some kind of framework and I'm no different (atm I call the one I use Garden). I'm not in any way emotionally attached to Cake code, although the name is still something I feel a bit proud to read about on one of the blogs I read. I think Cake isn't remarkable as a collection of code, but as a conglomerate of people and companies that it brought together. If all that is to disappear because of some internal disputes -- so be it. There's quite a number of decent PHP frameworks available nowadays. But pls come to senses, code more, fight less, and generally try to behave reasonably. Thank you :) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
