I think he's more so commenting on potential breakage of bakery articles (which is an issue IMO) rather than trying to track down the information.
There was a little list-talk on the edit-puts-atricles-back-into-queue issue and revisioning for articles back in Dec. -- not sure if it's on the todo for bakery in any form (not seeing a trac ticket). Sure, he could pull bakery svn and add article revisioning and post patches but that's somewhat unrealistic. Ultimately I don't think he should put down for commenting a real issue. Yeah he could have phrased it in a different manner but discarding it because of tone isn't cool. Why not, "yeah it's a workflow problem, you might check trac for a feature ticket and create one if it doesn't exit" or the like. Just kind of disappointed at the tone of the response I guess =/ -- Travis --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
