For those of us who actually ship applications, we know all too well that PHP 4 is far from a "museum" version. By my rather non-scientific observations, nearly 2/3rds of our customers (of which 99% run on shared hosts) still are running some flavor of PHP 4. Cake's compatibility with both PHP 4 & 5 was a huge selling point for us choosing the framework, and we appreciate the Cake team's continued support of PHP 4.
Brad ----------------------------------------------- Brad Daily Developer, SlideShowPro Director [EMAIL PROTECTED] On May 28, 8:17 am, "R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On May 26, 2:12 pm, "Larry E. Masters aka PhpNut" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > There is a roadmap for development:https://trac.cakephp.org/roadmap > > > Right now it is scheduled for 3.0, I may move the php 5 version only to 2.0. > > but it will remain as it is now till I decide what to do. > > That's really nice. I personally feel that there is no need to > support museum versions. > > -- > <?php echo 'Just another PHP saint'; ?> > Email: rrjanbiah-at-Y!com Blog:http://rajeshanbiah.blogspot.com/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
