Out of curiousity (and feel free to branch this thread if you think this goes off topic), why does Jippi need a different ORM layer? (I'd like to hear the reasons for/against Cake's ORM layer)
On 6/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jun 25, 11:25 am, "Dr. Tarique Sani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > CakePHP is a full stack framework and thus #1 its components are mostly > > tightly integrated with each other #2 no one wants to bother with using > it > > with anything else in bits and pieces > > I agree with #1: CakePHP is known for the fact that everything is > coded by CakePHP devs themselves. And I don't think this will > change. (whether this is a good or bad thing is another point) > > I don't agree with #2: I - for one- am one of those persons who likes > to hack (tinker with) stuff. Not that I have the time to actually > come up with something useful, but I know Jippi has been working on a > CakePHP fork which uses a 3rd party ORM layer (not propel and not pear > either, I forgot it's name). And I don't see a reason why there > wouldn't be more people like this. > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
