I didn't say that, my point was that once an example accompanied the function, any developer that touches it afterward would (should) be bright enough to update that documentation (as opposed to me having to submit a new patch) -- RE: "And another one later on if it changes. :)"
On 6/25/07, Chris Hartjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 6/25/07, Jonathan Langevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I just might do that, as an example in the code would be nice. if the > patch > > is accepted, then hopefully any dev that makes a future change would be > > bright enough to update the comments for the function > > > > Wow...that's a pretty shitty attitude to take towards contributors to > CakePHP. Does that mean I'm stupid because I try to write code that > is clear enough that comments aren't needed? > > -- > Chris Hartjes > Senior Developer > Cake Development Corporation > > My motto for 2007: "Just build it, damnit!" > > @TheBallpark - http://www.littlehart.net/attheballpark > @TheKeyboard - http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
