On 7/10/07, MrKrinkle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Of course, you won't ever share your framework so I'll have to take > > your word for it that it would "overtake the way you write web > > applicaitons". > > What the HELL are you basing any of those statements on?
You said you wouldn't release your framework as open source, didn't you" "I could (and may) release my framework open source, but truly, I'm not interested in running an open source php framework project. (I have other ideas for open source projects that I'd like to do, but a php framework doesn't interest me.) Sadly, since most frameworks don't serve the example I gave in this thread, maybe I have no choice." That's what I'm basing it on. Sounds to me like you won't do it. > > "It's not just lost on framework developers, it's lost on MOST web > > developers." > > On what do you base that? I base that on my experiences developing web applications for a long time. Your approach is a very interesting one, and not one that most developers are familiar with. I'm sure it works really well. I don't know why you seem to think that I don't think it would work. > >Of course, you won't ever share your framework so I'll have to take > >your word for it that it would "overtake the way you write web > >applicaitons". > > On what do you base that? I base it on the idea that I would have a very hard time understanding how what you are talking about would work without seeing some actual code that makes it happen. I'm getting the sense that you are taking something very personally that wasn't meant to be so personal. I'm the type of guy who needs to see some working code to understand it. > > I had reflexive respect for you but it's just been lost by your strict > assumptions from out of nowhere. Um, okay. See what I wrote above. You don't have to respect me. I'm not hurt or anything. > > I'm saddened by your lack of imagination. When you read my original > post, you really can't imagine a framework that handles namespaces the > way I describe. And you're a "senior" cakePHP developer? At least I > know what framework to avoid. See, now you're just trying to be mean instead of civil. What you call lack of imagination I call "I'd like to see it work before I totally dismiss it". Honest. If you go back and read what I said, I do believe I said that what you describe would be very hard to retrofit into CakePHP. I believe that what you are talking about is very interesting. I'd love to see some code that illustrates how it would work. Namespaces solve a lot of complicated problems (they are coming to PHP 6 according to what I've read lately), and yours is one of them. Wow, maybe the hot weather is making people cranky or something because I do believe that I said your idea is very interesting, and non-conventional based on my own experiences and I would love to see code for it. -- Chris Hartjes Senior Developer Cake Development Corporation My motto for 2007: "Just build it, damnit!" @TheBallpark - http://www.littlehart.net/attheballpark @TheKeyboard - http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
