Everyone should know that the Cake Software Foundation has already been open and helpful in providing opportunities for better documentation, so I'm not worried about making anyone mad over there. Everything is proceeding carefully and with open channels of communication.
On Jul 29, 11:58 am, "Chris Hartjes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/28/07, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Ah, well, there is a little more involved when it comes to trademark > > and patent law. But yes, the logo is definitely owned and must be > > "blessed." However, in a past project I worked on, Hasbro games tried > > to convince my publisher that they couldn't use the word "Monopoly" in > > the title of a book and lost the case flat out. So it is a little less > > cut-and-dry legally when referring to something rather than taking the > > logo, etc. > > The use of the name "CakePHP" is trademarked and copyrighted. I have > seen the documents myself online. Anyway, my point is this: do you > really want to make the driving force behind CakePHP (that would be > PhpNut) mad at you? I'm sure all it will take is a few emails between > the two of you to get everything all smoothed out. > > -- > Chris Hartjes > Senior Developer > Cake Development Corporation > > My motto for 2007: "Just build it, damnit!" > > @TheBallpark -http://www.littlehart.net/attheballpark > @TheKeyboard -http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
