> You don't need to add a constructor, and doing so is risky business. > Particularly as adding one and not calling the parent (with the passed > params, the model constructor has some parameters which you are > removing) basically means you are disabling all of cake's model work > and have about 0% chance of your models being of use.
Yes, I didn't think it would really *work*, I was just wondering why it allowed the page to display, and if it was some weird PHP 4/PHP 5 difference. > It's probably the zend optimizer problem, check the group for > solutions (hint find the __ method), I'd bet it turns out to be > missing/misnamed file/class/method. It was the Zend Optimizer issue. I disabled __() since I'm not using it in the app, and the Cake error page displayed telling me it couldn't find my table. Turned out I had a space prepending the database name in database config. Doh! Once the error page actually displayed it was an easy fix. Since it seems to be causing a lot of problems, perhaps it may be a good idea for Cake to check for the existence of the Zend Optimizer, and issue a warning message? Just a thought. Blank output bugs are hard to troubleshoot. Thanks for the help. I believe the blank model constructor helped precisely because it disables any non-trivial model functionality. -dave --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
