Thanks everybody for pitching in to this thread. However, maybe someone missed my biggest point.
1. If you read my first post you'll notice I'm bagging out an article that was approved on the bakery. Did anyone click the link and read the article - if so, who agrees with my response? and then later I asked... 2. What version of cake is the bakery running on? I don't care much for politics, but I would like to help out and fix what I can, even if that means re-writing half of the bakery. Cheers, Adam On Jan 4, 2:06 am, "Dr. Tarique Sani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 3, 2008 9:32 PM, dr. Hannibal Lecter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Say, would you agree that constructive criticism is good (even when > > related to Cake)? > > I am sure no one on this group will disagree with giving "constructive > criticism" is good -including the CakePHP dev team however I strongly > disagree with your definition and presumptions about the same. > > This is now indeed getting off topic so EOT for me > > Cheers > Tarique > > -- > ============================================================= > Cheesecake-Photoblog:http://cheesecake-photoblog.org > PHP for E-Biz:http://sanisoft.com > ============================================================= --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
