i am sorry, i really do not know how the msg has been sent since i did not even know hit the "send" button!!!!!!! anyway, i was saying that ity was REALLY fast building that admin area with it, we do have more than 40 channels in our company that we shall have them revamped and i am seriously concedering cakePHP but after making sure that we could rely on it, any comments or directions or points are more than welcommed, and thank you all again :-)
On Feb 8, 2008 10:58 AM, Ma'moon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > First of all i would like to thank you all for your responses and replies, > and to be honest, one of the main reasons why i have chosen cakePHP over any > other framework was its community and the support that i may get behind it, > so really thank you guys :-). > Ok, i do understand your points of view and i truly agree with you all, of > course there is a difference in performance between the different > environments that the application is running at , so debugging mode is > totally in a different state of production ... etc, and i also do agree that > human resources "programmers" costs much more than a computer does, but i > still need numbers to convince the managers about cakePHP, honestly > speaking, i want to work with cakePHP and i really would love to prove that > to them but they require numbers in order to convince them, Matt, i saw your > benchmarks but as you said, this is too old from what i am searching at and > to be clear i have to say that i am not looking for a comparesion between > frameworks here but rather i am looking for benchmarks or reports to prove > that cakePHP worth having it in our production servers. > currently cakePHP is being used one of our channels where we have build > the admin area of this channel using cakePHP that was REALLY > > > On Feb 8, 2008 9:20 AM, MattC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Regarding Zoe's comment about Cake checking the db columns every time > > you retrieve data, that only happens when debug is on. Otherwise the > > table schema is cached. > > > > In general you should look into Cake's built in caching which can > > negate a lot of the framework overhead. Here is quick test I did to > > benchmark the improvement with cache turned on: > > > > http://www.pseudocoder.com/archives/2007/02/27/cakephp-cache-performance/ > > > > That was almost a year ago and used Cake 1.1 with file based caching. > > > > -Matt > > www.pseudocoder.com > > > > On Feb 8, 6:26 am, Ma'moon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello guys, > > > i am truly sure that cake is my choice when it comes to choose a > > framework > > > from the bunch of frameworks available out there but i really need to > > see > > > some benchmarks in order to convince my managers that cake is really > > for it > > > and it would be our best choice, is there any benchmarks reports > > available, > > > i would be thankful for any links being posted here or pointed > > anywhere > > > else. > > > > > > Regards, Ma'moon > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
