Despite the naming convention, isn't the HABTM association really just
modeling the shared foreign key table relationship? For example, you
have a 'users' table and an 'items' table, and they are tied together
with the items_users table. Not considering cake, you would use this
because several users could have the same item, or no items, or
multiple items.

Am I missing something?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake 
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to