On Apr 9, 9:14 pm, "Chris Hartjes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 11:52 AM, R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > File inclusions are always a overhead unless you use caching;
> > but many times it's ok for the module organization. Cake's way of
> > handling file inclusions are real overhead (checking file_exists and
> > then calling require_once); but can be solved with caching.
>
> *sigh*
>
> Has my reputation gotten to the point where people disregard what I
> say in favour of trying to make me look dumb? It appears so. I am
> resigned to my fate.
>
> Isn't 1.2 doing that lookup anyway, regardless of where you're
> locating your files? You cannot avoid it, so pointing out your opinon
> on how Cake handles file inclusions does not answer the question.
>
> To expand on my statement "compared to what" I say repeat: compared to what?
>
> * the overhead of loading Javascript and style sheets in the browser?
> * the overhead of reading and writing data from data sources?
> * the use of XHR by your application, trying up server resources
>
> I know people won't believe me, but the alleged overhead of Cake's
> file inclusion methods will be the least of your worries when building
> a web app with it.
<snip>
Ok, you started dodging to be smart; but your conclusions still
look more dumber to me.
--
<?php echo 'Just another PHP saint'; ?>
Email: rrjanbiah-at-Y!com Blog: http://rajeshanbiah.blogspot.com/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
