Thanks Fred, I these are good suggestions for testing out too......

On Apr 19, 12:28 am, Fred Hirsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is just opinion (I am not a core developer), please take it with a
> grain of salt:
>
> The framework includes the view functionality, testing it as a benchmark
> without the view is not a valid test (in my opinion). The only thing you
> are testing by doing this within a controller is to test the overhead of
> loading the framework itself. Excluding the view could skew this
> significantly. You could just create a view with "Hello World" and this
> would ensure you are testing the framework as it is "normally" utilized.
> Are you truly exploring using the framework without views? Perhaps your
> needs might be better served with a different solution. A framework may
> not be what you need.
>
> Some other questions:
> - If your purpose is to define overhead issues, would you include
> components, helpers, etc?
> - Will you also attempt this test with a round trip to the database?
> - How about attempting to somehow execute a controller method without
> loading the DB modules?
> - Where do you stop in excluding framework components before its no
> longer a framework?
>
> Good luck with you test,
> Fred
>
> Wizardry wrote:
> > Is it possible to have a controller that prints a simple 'Hello World'
> > without having an underlying index view?
>
> > In case anyone is wondering why would I want such a thing, well I
> > wanted to test the performance of the CakePHP framework and wished to
> > know the differences in response time for the controller making a call
> > to the view to do an action and correspondingly doing it itself.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake 
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to