On May 4, 8:17 pm, Dérico Filho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip>
> First off, it is a fork. As a matter of voting, I am against and
> thefore I shall not support it. I know I am no one, but it is a
> thought anyway.
>
> There is a particular clause I deemed to be disattached of reality.
> CakePHP, shall support PHP 6 and abandon PHP 4 as it lifespan passes
> thru time. For instance, if you propose that your Cake+ drops supports
> for PHP 4 now, it would break v4 users, what you do then? Use PHP
> Downgrade, you add as a third-party component on what CakePHP has
> bundled in its core, quite well developed. Perhaps you could adventure
> in developing a new Cake-like framework, but as far as I can on your
> "feature" list I would say it is going on Bad&wRong ways.
I respect everyone's view. But, it's too early to judge if it's
wrong or not. While I'm positive, you're against to it. Let's see what
the future decides.
--
<?php echo 'Just another PHP saint'; ?>
Email: rrjanbiah-at-Y!com Blog: http://rajeshanbiah.blogspot.com/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
