> > Hey > >> The content is owned by the Cake Software Foundation (...) > > Can you elaborate why is that ? > > Why not use GPL ? GFDL ? Creative Commons ? > > For me it's wierd that a community contributed documentation cannot be > > used by the community without an approval. > > Mostly because we don't want 17 different copies of the content out on > the web in different forms. Why don't you want that ? wikipedia is freely available and i don't see the problem where articles are available on other sites as long as people know its from wikipedia. People know that the official docs are at cakephp.org.
> but the content in the manual is meant to be reviewed and contributed > to in an official setting. Yes but that doesn't really mean that the content couldn't be under GPL or whatever. > What did you want to use it for? i didnt want to use it, but lets say - an in-house company cake course. My point is: "It's weird that a community contributed documentation cannot be used by the community without an approval." I'm love you guys and i'm ok with the cookbook, i just think its not fair that community contributed docs aren't under an open license http://www.free-culture.cc/ greets, -- Marcin Domanski http://kabturek.info --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
