On Jun 12, 8:22 am, "Jonathan Snook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would disagree with your assessment of the conversation.
Good.
> We're debating two key issues:
>
> 1. The quality and features of the email component as it stands today; and
>From the messages I read it was clear the current implementation did
not fit everyone's needs. I guess I was curious how we could improve
it, but saw most people suggest to just use something else.
> 2. Whether the CakePHP development team should be "reinventing the
> wheel" or whether certain components truly should be part of the core.
There are a lot of other classes available and I am certainly not
against using them. But since we have the component in the core, it's
not going anywhere, and we are not going to include 3rd party
libraries, can we do something to match those features without
bloating Cake. My goal is for the Email component to solve the
majority of the needs. For example, not everyone needs to send 10,000
emails per second. So, maybe this thread is more about an edge case
and I should just move on :)
> Neither of these debates is about "taking vs giving".
I must have just woken up on the wrong side of the bed. Just making
sure. ;) Thanks for the clarification.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---