Very concisely explained. Thank you. Time for me to stop the
comparison's with Java, and learn the Cake/PHP way.

I'd held off learning PHP in anger until the introduction of better OO
support in PHP5. Clearly it helps encapsulate logic and re-use and
prevents spaghetti code (scripting). I'd naturally assumed that OO
concepts would get taken to the domain-object level, but as you say,
this is potentially a needless overhead.

Apologies if I sounded derogatory. It's my British sense of humour, I
guess. Nothing more. (That, and the desire for my question to gain
attention). I didn't go so far as to state that Cake is half-baked;
merely asked the question.

As you said yourself, it's not typical ORM. I doubt I'll be the last
Java developer to venture down the Cake path, and ask similar
questions.

Thanks again. time for me to fatten up my models!
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to