On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 4:09 PM, aranworld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For the last 6 months or so, most of the changes made to the 1.2 core > code have been with regards to test coverage. Very little (if any) of > the most commonly used API has changed, and I think the developers > have been pretty clear that not much will change either. For the most > part, websites I put together in March 2008 still function perfectly > fine with the latest version of the core code. > > Upgrading from 1.1 to 1.2, however, does require a bit of work,
Since this project is Greenfield, it shouldn't be a problem. All I have now is the login page, home page and various user add,edit, list stuff. Did note the file extension changed from .thtml to .ctp. > because of the changes made to the way the HTML helper forms work. > Also, so many more people are focused on 1.2, that if there are any > major vulnerabilities or performance problems discovered, they will be > found quickly making its use relatively safe from a project management > standpoint. > Also most of the on-line discussion seems to assume 1.2. With the release being nearly 2 years old, I;d say it is mature enough for our use. After all I'm writing this on GMail(beta)! Thanks Ed -- Ed Howland http://greenprogrammer.blogspot.com http://twitter.com/ed_howland --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
